Interactions in the context of mixed anova in psychotherapy science
‒ Recommendations for application and interpretation ‒
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15135/2022.10.1.91-108Abstract
In this article of the series Statistics in Psychotherapy Science, the application of methods for comparing several related k-independent and k-dependent samples and their interactions in one model (mixed ANOVA and multi-factorial) in the sense of a best practice approach is presented. Furthermore, their appliance in RCT (Randomised Controlled Trials) is discussed. Recommendations are given for (1) an optimal choice of procedure, (2) the use of effect sizes, (3) the designation of the relevance of the results and (4) report conventions for the presentation of results. In addition, the multifactorial ANOVA for independent samples is presented as another application area of interactions. Finally, the use of this group of procedures in the context of psychotherapy science is illustrated using practical examples.
References
Aden, J., Bunina, A. & Vavrik, C. (2021). Die einfaktorielle Varianzanalyse für unabhängige Stichproben und der Kruskal-Wallis-Test im psychotherapiewissenschaftlichen Kontext. Empfehlungen für Anwendung und Interpretation. SFU Forschungsbulletin, 9(1), 68–86.
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G.K. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory (2. Aufl.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Bortz, J. (2006). Statistik: Für Human-und Sozialwissenschaftler. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag.
Bortz, J., & Schuster, C. (2010). Statistik fur Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (7., vollstandig überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Djulbegovic, B., & Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. The lancet, 390(10092), 415-423.
Gattermeyer, S., Vladarski, C. & Aden, J. (2020). Der t-, Wilcoxon- und Binomial/Vorzeichen-Test für zwei verbundene Stichproben im psychotherapiewissenschaftlichen Forschungskontext. Empfehlung für Anwendung und Interpretation. SFU Forschungsbulletin, 8(2), 128–146.
Grossman, J. & Mackenzie, J. (2005). The Randomized controlld trial. Gold standard, or merely standard?. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, volume 48, number 4 (autumn 2005), 516–34.
Jadad, A. R., & Enkin, M. W. (2007). Randomized controlled trials: Questions, answers and musings. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Janczyk, M., & Pfister, R. (2020). Inferenzstatistik verstehen. Heidelberg: Springer.
Kuhner, C., Burger, C., Keller, F., & Hautzinger, M. (2007). Reliabilitat und Validitat des revidierten Beck-Depressionsinventars (BDI-II). Befunde aus deutschsprachigen Stichproben. Der Nervenarzt,78, 651‒656.
Philips, B. & Falkenström, F. (2021). What Research Evidence Is Valid for Psychotherapy Research? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11:625380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.625380.
Pocock, S. J. &. Elbourne, D. R. (2000). Randomized trials or observational tribulations? N Engl J Med 342:1907–09.
Rasch, B., Friese, M., Hofmann, W., & Naumann, E. (2014). Varianzanalyse mit Messwiederholung. Quantitative Methoden Band 2: Einführung in die Statistik (S. 99–141). Heidelberg: Springer.
Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Bonevski, B., Green, L. W., & D’Este, C. (2007). Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. American journal of preventive medicine, 33(2), 155-161.
Seistock, D., Bunina, A. & Aden J. (2020). Der t-, Welch- und U-Test im psychotherapiewissenschaftlichen Forschungskontext. Empfehlungen für Anwendung und Interpretation. SFU Forschungsbulletin, 8(1), 87–105.
Ware, J.H. & Hamel, M.B. (2011). Pragmatic trials—guides to better patient care? N Engl J Med., 364:1685–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1103502.
West, S. G., Duan, N., Pequegnat, W., Gaist, P., Des Jarlais, D. C., Holtgrave, D., Szapocznik, J., Fishbein, M., Rapkin, B., Clatts, M., & Mullen, D. (2008). Alternatives to the Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Public Health, 98: 1359-1366.
Witte, K. (2019). Angewandte Statistik in der Bewegungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Springer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The reproduction of articles published in any form is allowed under the condition that the citation is comprehensive. Prints in other publication media or public media require the written consent of the editor and can be requested under: forschung@sfu.ac.at